Keywords
research methodology
research competencies
quality assurance
How to Cite
Abstract
The present study aims to assess the quality of the methodology used in master's theses, identify both challenges and best practices, and develop practical recommendations. The analysis is based on a documentary study of 40 master's theses (Educational Sciences, 2016–2024), which combines both quantitative and qualitative approaches.
The study revealed that the systematic, stage-by-stage development of students' research competencies significantly improves the quality of master's theses. Programs that include sequential courses in academic writing, research methods, and research practice are more likely to enable students to better formulate research problems in their papers, analytically communicate methodology, and provide in-depth interpretations of results. The study also identified clear systemic challenges: insufficient reflection on research limitations in some papers, descriptive presentation of methodology, and insufficient justification of research object selection strategies. The paper presents comprehensive recommendations and examples of best practices aimed at further enhancing research quality.
References
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). London: Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). London: SAGE Publications.
Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). London: SAGE Publications.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Paltridge, B., & Starfield, S. (2007). Thesis and dissertation writing in a second language. London: Routledge.
Price, J. H., & Murnan, J. (2004). Research limitations and the necessity of reporting them. American Journal of Health Education, 35(2), 66-67.
Sandelowski, M. (2010). What's in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Research in Nursing & Health, 33(1), 77-84.
Wisker, G. (2012). The good supervisor: Supervising postgraduate and undergraduate research for doctoral theses and dissertations (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.